As a result, American atheists contribute some of the most ill-informed/uneducated commentary on the internet.
Alexa indicates that 5.01% search traffic of the American Atheists website comes from a misspelling of the word atheist
Alexa is a popular web traffic tracking company. Below is a portion of Alexa's site overview for the website of the American Atheists organization and notice that 5.01% of their search engine traffic comes from the keyword "athiest" which is a misspelling of the world atheist.
From the Alexa website on October 17, 2014:
Site Overview
Top Keywords from Search Engines
Which search keywords send traffic to this site?
Keyword | Percent of Search Traffic | ||
---|---|---|---|
1. atheist | 52.97% | ||
2. atheism | 14.80% | ||
3. american atheists | 8.97% | ||
4. athiest | 5.01% | ||
5. atheists | 3.82% |
Embarrassing incident concerning the website of the American Atheists
From the blog post: More proof that atheism is ignorant. American Atheists organization badly embarrasses itself:
Shockofgod released a humorous video entitled Proof atheism & evolution are stupid which is featured below.
On the video, he first did a Google search at Google USA for the word "atheism". The #1 search result for atheism was for the website of the American Atheists organization and they misspelled the words "separation" and "church" on the main page title tag for their website. The title of their website reads: "Supporting Civil Rights for Atheists and the Seperation of Curch and ...". Did the American Atheist organization's webmaster go to one of the many evolution indoctrinating public schools with a high drop out rate? It appears so!
Is it any wonder that the American Atheists organization has been silent concerning the 15 questions for evolutionists of the Question Evolution! Campaign? Besides being poor spellers the American Atheists organization's staff is probably poor when it comes to science as well!
In addition, on the video by Shockofgod there is a discussion with evolutionists concerning the 15 questions for evolutionists where an atheists claims that creationists are allegedly buying the alleged transitional fossils and hiding them (See the blog post:
Evolutionist claims creationists are buying up alleged transitional fossils and then hiding them from the public!).
But I want to list five reasons why I think we ought to assume that the gospels are reliable until proven wrong:
ReplyDelete--nice thinking